How many G 1145 do i need Form 2014-2023

I live in Germany. I got an invite to the Quora partner program the day I landed in USA for a business trip. So from what I understand, irrespective of the number of views on your answers, there is some additional eligibility criteria for you to even get an email invite.If you read the terms of service, point 1 states:Eligibility. You must be located in the United States to participate in this Program. If you are a Quora employee, you are eligible to participate and earn up to a maximum of $200 USD a month. You also agree to be bound by the Platform Terms (https://www.quora.com/about/tos) as a condition of participation.Again, if you check the FAQ section:How can other people I know .participate?The program is invite-only at this time, but we intend to open it up to more people as time goes on.So my guess is that Quora is currently targeting people based out of USA, who are active on Quora, may or may not be answering questions frequently ( I have not answered questions frequently in the past year or so) and have a certain number of consistent answer views.Edit 1: Thanks to @Anita Scotch, I got to know that the Quora partner program is now available for other countries too. Copying Anutau2019s comment here:If you reside in one of the Countries, The Quora Partner Program is active in, you are eligible to participate in the program.u201d ( I read more will be added, at some point, but here are the countries, currently eligible at this writing,) U.S., Japan, Germany, Spain, France, United Kingdom, Italy and Australia.11/14/2018Edit 2 : Here is the latest list of countries with 3 new additions eligible for the Quora Partner program:U.S., Japan, Germany, Spain, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Canada, Australia, Indonesia, India and Brazil.Thanks to Monoswita Rez for informing me about this update.

A two-hour gig? That's 120 minutes of on stage performance or setup inclusion? I'll go with stage time, and also assume you've negotiated appropriate setup, and such.Another assumption is genre. I'll assume it's pop structured (as most radio friendly music is these days), so average song time would be roughly 3 and a half minutesu2026give or take.You're looking at roughly 30 songs. Thatsu2026over 2 hours. Now, that's a rough estimate, as song times vary, etc.Oh, but wait. You'll need to include breaks, for u201cpersonnelu201d i.e. the band members. Normally, the drummer will need the longest break, followed by others. The drummer is using all four limbs continuously, sou2026they need them.If you're headlining, and depending on what you've negotiated, you might not be allotted u201cdead airu201d, so someone's staying on stage on breaks. Usually, that means at least a guitar player and/or the singer. Maybe not a long guitar solo, butu2026maybe an acoustic filler/singalong for the crowd. Plus, in between banter, there's that too (paring that down was always a plus for us back in the day)So, practice 30ish and get them flawless, because you're only going to need 20ish. Why 30ish? Becauseu2026more is good for flexibility. Always. Plus, it allows you to keep your set list semi-u201dfreshu201d, while only putting in a little extra work.setlist.fm - the setlist wiki is a good resource for structuring a setlist in a professional way (I wish it was around during the u201ctrial and erroru201d days.)

I think youu2019re asking the wrong question. Let me explain.Some things in life are a numbers game, and some games have higher hit rates than others.Gambling, for example, has a very low hit rate and low odds of winning (1 in a million or worse), no matter how many times you do it. Slot machines are designed to fuck you.On the other hand, if you are trying to pick up a girl at the bar, you could get lucky on the first try or it might take you ten to twenty cheesy pick up lines, largely depending on your strategy, quality of your pick up lines and perhaps what cologne youu2019re wearing.I recommend Burberry.Even better, if you have a wing man to u201cintroduceu201d you to the other girl, a la Game, come prepared with jokes/stories, focus on her friend and deploy psychological tactics, buy her drinks, donu2019t make a complete ass of yourself or come off as to desperate, visit several bars in one nightu2023 then youu2019ll probably increase your odds.Picking up girls, like applying for jobs, can be easily mistaken for a u201cnumbersu201d game but there are clearly strategies you can identify and employ to increase your likelihood of success.u201cIu2019m not just a number, you little cockboy!u201dBack to jobs. So, unfortunately just u201csendingu201d job application falls into a pure numbers game. I have a friend who sent over 200 applications, despite having a nice resume, and didnu2019t get a response for hardly anything. I think he was invited to one interview and failed.Most HR wonu2019t review your resume because their reviewal system is fucked, or inefficient. Or maybe they have someone they are already interviewing, and its not a priority. Or they have a bias and read something on your resume that immediately turned them off. Or maybe theyu2019re racist. Who knows.The solution? Look at other ways to u201cboostu201d your application, or other ways in. Here are some ideas:Forget quantity. Focus on quality. Donu2019t send 200 resumes u2023 just donu2019t do it.Include a detailed, personal cover letter explaining why you are interested in the role/company, and why you think you can add value. Tell them why you have always wanted to work at the company, and why you have a strong work ethic to get shit done. Find the email address of the HR person (you can use a tool like Rapportive thats free) or send them an inmail on Linkedin.Call the company. Most people are afraid of doing this or donu2019t bother, and you will most certainly stand out in an employers eyes if you do this. Find the number of the company, call in, ask for HR or the hiring manager. Basically summarize what youu2019ve written in your cover letter, except in shorter words, and tell them why youu2019re so interested in their business. Ask them to meet.Letter: Physically post your cover letter and resume to their address. This will get their attention. Kill some trees, itu2019s worth it.Network: Go to networking events. This will increase your chances of finding a job in general, or meeting someone who is connected to the company you are interested in and can therefore give you a referral.Persistence: I have always gotten an interview request for any job I have applied to, or at least a casual meeting, because I was persistent and creative. I wrote a good cover letter, followed up, called in directly to the company, sent written thank you letters, and asked to be referred.Sending resumes and clicking u201capplyu201d is easy and wonu2019t get you anywhere. The above tips take more time, effort, and several tries to see their effectiveness. But they sure as hell beat applying to hundreds of jobs online aimlessly. I guarantee youu2019ll get some results if you give them a shot!Good luck!u201cMoshi moshi Mr. CEO, Iu2019d sent my resume previously through your website with no response, so wanted to follow up and express my sincere interest in applying for a job at your company. Iu2019d love the opportunity to meet you in person to discuss further. Howu2019s this Wednesday at 4pm at your office?u201d

It depends a lot on the question you want answered. Some statistics (and answers) need a more solid backing and a higher percentage to be valid. You should look into some basic statistics concepts like confidence intervals. It should be understandable if you've taken some college level calculus. What confidence intervals is is that based on your results, and the number of results you have, you can tell with X amount of confidence that this is the right answer. Of course it can't apply to everything, but that's the general point.

As many as you want to !

You are asking for the domination number[1] of a certain Johnson graph[2] (please, no Big Lebowski jokes). In standard notation, this number is denoted [math]gamma(J(90,5))[/math].(Note: I'm assuming that the u201c5 numbers drawn out of 90u201d are all different, which I believe is the case in most lotteries).The Johnson graph [math]J(90,5)[/math] is the graph whose vertices correspond to all the [math]5[/math]-element subsets of [math]{1,2,ldots,90}[/math], and two vertices are adjacent (connected with an edge) whenever the corresponding sets have [math]4[/math] elements in common. For example, [math]{2,3,5,8,13}[/math] is adjacent to [math]{2,3,8,13,77}[/math] but not to [math]{2,3,5,9,14}[/math].A dominating set for a graph is a set of vertices that is adjacent to each vertex not in the set. If you have a dominating set of tickets for [math]J(90,5)[/math], whatever the winning combination turns out to be has at least [math]4[/math] matches with a ticket in your hand.Calculating the size of a minimal dominating set, called the domination number, is computationally hard (the corresponding decision problem is NP-complete), and our graph [math]G=J(90,5)[/math] is no peanut: it has [math]N=binom{90}{5}=43, 949, 268[/math] vertices, each with [math]d=5(90-5)=425[/math] neighbors.Of course, [math]G[/math] is a very specific and highly symmetric graph, so it's entirely possible that a minimal dominating set for it, or at least a relatively small dominating set, can be determined explicitly using some reasoning particular to this case.As with any optimization problem, we can pursue two competing paths: we may seek upper bounds by exhibiting some good dominating sets, and we can seek lower bounds by attempting to prove that every dominating set must be at least as large as some size [math]B[/math].Since the degree of [math]G[/math] is [math]425[/math], a dominating set must have at least [math]N/425[/math] elements, which sets a lower bound of [math]B=103, 411[/math] tickets. With fewer tickets than this you stand no chance of guaranteeing a four-element match. I suspect there is, in fact, a dominating set of this size, or very close to it.An equally obvious upper bound is obtained by simply scanning all [math]4[/math]-number combinations [math](a,b,c,d)[/math] in our range and filling in the fifth number arbitrarily. This yields a dominating set of size [math]binom{90}{4}[/math]. That's about 2.5 million tickets, which is far more than the theoretical lower bound, but it's also far less than the 43 million possible winning combinations.Of course, this is very wasteful. We made no use of the fact that each ticket can cover five [math]4[/math]-number combinations, not just one. A better approach is to use a standard trick in design theory or coding theory: impose a linear constraint.Specifically, consider those combinations where the sum of the numbers is divisible by [math]90[/math]. About [math]1/90[/math] of the combinations are special like that (The exact number is [math]488, 326[/math], which is just [math]N/90[/math] rounded up).Suppose you filled tickets with all of these special combinations. If the winning one happens to be special, you got it. If it's not, then in almost all cases it has four numbers in common with not only one but five of your special combinations.The reason is that given any winning combination [math]{a,b,c,d,e}[/math], you can keep [math]a,b,c[/math] and [math]d[/math] intact and find an appropriate fifth number [math]x[/math] (instead of [math]e[/math]) which makes the sum [math]a+b+c+d+x[/math] divisible by [math]90[/math]. The combination [math]{a,b,c,d,x}[/math] is then in your hand, unless it so happens that [math]x[/math] is identical to one of [math]a,b,c,d[/math]. In this case you can try picking another element of the winning combo, say [math]d[/math], and try [math]{a,b,c,y,e}[/math] whose sum is divisible by [math]90[/math]. Once again, we just need to hope that [math]y[/math] isn't identical to one of the other four numbers.For example, suppose the winning combination was [math]{1,2,3,42,60}[/math]. The quadruplet [math]{1,2,3,42}[/math] is nowhere to be found among the special combinations, because the missing fifth number would have been [math]42[/math] itself. However, that's ok because [math]{1,2,3,24,60}[/math] is special, and matches four of the numbers in the winning combination. We can't u201cfixu201d the [math]60[/math], but we can fix any of the other numbers.In very rare instances, a winning combination may not be u201cfixableu201d at all. For example, suppose that the lottery was played with three numbers instead of five. The winning combination [math]{10,40,70}[/math] cannot be modified into a special combination by changing any single number.If that had happened in our case, we would simply have added a few tickets to cover for those pathological cases. But I'm quite sure that's not necessary: as far as I can tell there arenu2019t any u201cbadu201d combinations of five numbers in the range 1 through 90.The set of special tickets guarantees winning the lottery, but itu2019s still about 4.7x larger than the theoretical lower bound. This isn't surprising because, as we said, most winning combinations are actually covered by 5 of our tickets, though sometimes it's just 4. That's where this factor of 4.7 comes from.We can seek various pruning techniques to find winning sets of fewer tickets, but I couldn't yet find one that'll take you down to around 110,000 tickets. I'm 100% sure this is addressed in the literature, and I'll update this answer if I find anything.Footnotes[1] Dominating set - Wikipedia[2] Johnson graph - Wikipedia